Skip to main content
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Menu
Toggle Main Menu
Homepage
Main navigation
تحلیلها
کارشناسان
دربارهما
پشتیبانی
نقشه و چند رسانهای
مباحث روز :
نظامی و امنیتی
تروریسم
اسرائیل
فلسطینیها
لبنان
ایران
Toggle List of
منطقهها
منطقهها و کشورها
اردن
اسرائیل
ایران
ترکیه
خاورمیانه
سوریه
شمال آفریقا
عراق
فلسطینیها
لبنان
مصر
کشورهای حاشیهخلیج فارس
موضوع
انرژی و اقتصاد
تروریسم
خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
دمکراسی و اصلاح
رقابت قدرتهای بزرگ
روابط عرب و اسرائیل
سیاست آمریکا
عرب و اسلام سیاسی
فرایند صلح
منع اشاعه
نظامی و امنیتی
Close List of All Regions and Issues
Close
Search Policy Analysis
TWI English
TWI Arabic:
اللغة العربية
TWI Persian:
فارسی
Fikra Forum
Close Menu
Close
Search Policy Analysis
جستجو
All Policy Analysis by Michael Eisenstadt
Filter by:
Keyword
Region
- Any -
مصر
کشورهای حاشیهخلیج فارس
ایران
عراق
اسرائیل
اردن
لبنان
خاورمیانه
شمال آفریقا
فلسطینیها
سوریه
ترکیه
Issue
- Any -
عرب و اسلام سیاسی
روابط عرب و اسرائیل
دمکراسی و اصلاح
انرژی و اقتصاد
رقابت قدرتهای بزرگ
خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
نظامی و امنیتی
فرایند صلح
منع اشاعه
تروریسم
سیاست آمریکا
تاریخ انتشار
- Any -
Past 7 Days
Past 30 Days
Past Year
Custom range...
Start date
End date
Type
- Any -
مقالهها و دیدگاهها
تحلیل کوتاه
گزارشهای تفصیلی
Sort by
Oldest first
Newest first
Found
346
results
Brief Analysis
Security in Iraq:
Prospects for Progress in the al-Maliki Era
On April 28, 2006, Jeffrey White, Matt Sherman, and Michael Eisenstadt addressed The Washington Institute's Special Policy Forum. Jeffrey White, the Berrie Defense Fellow at The Washington Institute, spent thirty-four years with the Defense Intelligence Agency. Matt Sherman recently returned from Iraq after serving for two years as the senior
۵ مهٔ ۲۰۰۶
◆
Jeffrey White
Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
Assessing Iraq's Sunni Arab Insurgency
This article was featured by the U.S. Army Professional Writing Collection. Three years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq and the fall of Saddam Hussein, confusion and controversy still surround the insurgency in Iraq’s Sunni Triangle. Part of this is due to the nontraditional character of the Sunni Arab insurgency
۱ مهٔ ۲۰۰۶
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Jeffrey White
Brief Analysis
Quelling Iraq's Sectarian Violence:
What the United States Can Do
The ongoing debate over whether or not Iraq is on the verge or in the midst of a civil war is a distraction from the main challenge the United States now faces in Iraq: how to reduce or contain sectarian (and ethnic) violence that could derail the political process and
۲۷ مارس ۲۰۰۶
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
Deter and Contain:
Dealing with a Nuclear Iran
Testimony before the House Committee on Armed Services Conclusions Efforts to deter and contain a nuclear Iran would likely encounter significant challenges. The nature of the Islamic Republic, regional politics, and Iran’s involvement in terrorism make establishing a stable deterrent relationship with a nuclear Iran risky and uncertain. The experience
۱ فوریهٔ ۲۰۰۶
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
In-Depth Reports
Assessing Iraq's Sunni Arab Insurgency
The confluence of key political events and security developments in Iraq suggests that the next several months will be of immeasurable importance for the country's future. The success of upcoming elections, the formation of a constitutionally based government, and the potential withdrawal of significant U.S. forces will depend in large
۱۳ دسامبر ۲۰۰۵
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Jeffrey White
Brief Analysis
What Else Can Be Done about Iran's Nuclear Program?
On November 18, 2005, Michael Eisenstadt, Patrick Clawson, and Henry Sokolski discussed policy options regarding Iran's nuclear program in light of the November 24 meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the publication of Getting Ready for a Nuclear Ready Iran (U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute)
۲۳ نوامبر ۲۰۰۵
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Patrick Clawson
Brief Analysis
The Sunni Arab Insurgency:
A Spent or Rising Force?
Warnings by Sunni politicians of even greater violence if Sunni Arab concerns are not addressed in the draft Iraqi constitution raise the question: could the insurgency get worse? The answer can be found by examining the insurgency's demographic dimension. The Insurgency's Recruitment Base Sufficiently detailed demographic data exist to allow
۲۶ اوت ۲۰۰۵
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
۳ مهٔ ۲۰۰۵
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Assessing the Iraqi Insurgency (Part II):
Devising Appropriate Analytical Measures
In countering insurgencies—wars without fronts, against often-elusive enemies—there is a temptation to rely on quantitative measures to gauge success. Although tracking and assessing trends in, for example, the number of insurgents and attacks is fundamental to any tactical or operational appreciation of the Sunni Arab insurgency in Iraq, a strategic
۲۵ مارس ۲۰۰۵
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Hizballah, Iran, and the Prospects for a New Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process
The death of Yasser Arafat and the approach of Palestinian elections on January 9 have rekindled hopes for the peace process. However, if history is a guide, Hizballah and Iran—which worked tirelessly to undermine the Oslo Process—will try to sabotage such efforts. (Indeed, Israeli intelligence reports cited in the Israeli
۲۲ دسامبر ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Neri Zilber
Brief Analysis
The Iraqi Security Forces (Part II):
Challenges and Concerns
The U.S.-led coalition and the Iraqi Interim Government (IIG) have had to confront both bureaucratic red tape and insurgent terrorism in their effort to recruit, train, and equip the Iraqi Security Forces (ISF). Nevertheless, progress is being made. Equipment is arriving, ISF personnel are being trained, and the flow of
۲۹ اکتبر ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
The Iraqi Security Forces (Part I):
Background and Current Status
The counterinsurgency in Iraq has entered a critical phase: the start of operations by U.S.-led coalition and Iraqi forces to pacify insurgent-held areas, smoothing the way for January 2005 elections. In recent weeks, coalition and Iraqi forces have battled insurgents in Tal Afar, Samarra, Mahmudiya, and Latifiya, as well as
۲۶ اکتبر ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
War in Iraq:
Looking Forward, Looking Back
On September 14, 2004, Michael Eisenstadt and Jeffrey White addressed a Washington Institute Special Policy Forum held in celebration of their forthcoming Institute anthology Operation Iraqi Freedom and the New Iraq: Insights and Forecasts (edited by Michael Knights). Mr. Eisenstadt is a senior fellow at the Institute, specializing in military
۲۲ سپتامبر ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Jeffrey White
Brief Analysis
The IAEA and Iran:
The Perils of Inaction
Deep divisions among the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), currently meeting in Vienna, continue to hamper U.S. efforts on two key fronts: pressing Iran to suspend work on its nuclear program, and referring allegations of Iranian violations of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty to the UN
۱۶ سپتامبر ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
September 11, Three Years On:
The Growing Trend toward Mega-Terror in the Middle East
In recent years, especially since September 11, 2001, several Middle Eastern terrorist groups have shown growing interest in waging mega-terror -- attacks that would kill hundreds, even thousands, of innocent victims, cause mass disruption, and profoundly affect the psychology of the targeted society. While not the first incidents of mega-terror
۱۰ سپتامبر ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Middle East Weapons Proliferation:
Lessons from Iraq and Beyond
New Lessons Regarding Proliferation The culmination of Operation Iraqi Freedom has given rise to much debate concerning the exact nature of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs. Similarly, ongoing negotiations with Iran regarding its nuclear activities have also been dogged by imprecise intelligence and unclear strategies. Both of these
۳۰ ژوئن ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
Implications of a Nuclear Iran
Testimony before the House Committee on International Relations, Subcommittee on the Middle East and Central Asia The emergence of a nuclear Iran could alter the balance of power in the Middle East, leading to a heightened risk of conflict, and possibly nuclear war. This raises several questions: How close is
۲۴ ژوئن ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
The Transfer of Sovereignty in Iraq:
Prospects for a Security Agreement
In congressional hearings on Iraq last week, legislators repeatedly asked testifying administration officials whether the United States would negotiate a formal security agreement with the post-June 30 Iraqi interim government. The officials explained that following the planned transfer of sovereignty to Iraq, U.S. and coalition forces would operate in accordance
۲۷ آوریل ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Michael Knights
Brief Analysis
Crisis in Iraq:
Assessments and Implications (Part II)
On April 16, 2004, Michael Eisenstadt, a senior fellow at The Washington Institute, addressed the Institute's Special Policy Forum, along with Jeffrey White and Michael Knights. The following is a summary of Mr. Eisenstadt's remarks. Read a summary of Jeffrey White and Michael Knights's remarks. Recent U.S. confrontations with insurgents
۲۲ آوریل ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
The Israeli Exodus from Gaza:
A Moment of Truth for the International Community
Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon arrives in Washington on April 14 to present President George W. Bush with his plan for "unilateral disengagement" from the Gaza Strip. Details of the plan still need to be nailed down, while the fate of Sharon (facing the possibility of bribery charges) and that
۵ آوریل ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Pagination
Previous page
‹‹
First page
« First
…
Page
9
Page
10
Page
11
Page
12
Current page
13
Page
14
Page
15
Page
16
Page
17
…
Last page
Last »
Next page
››