Skip to main content
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Menu
Toggle Main Menu
Homepage
Main navigation
تحلیلها
کارشناسان
دربارهما
پشتیبانی
نقشه و چند رسانهای
مباحث روز :
نظامی و امنیتی
تروریسم
اسرائیل
فلسطینیها
لبنان
ایران
Toggle List of
منطقهها
منطقهها و کشورها
اردن
اسرائیل
ایران
ترکیه
خاورمیانه
سوریه
شمال آفریقا
عراق
فلسطینیها
لبنان
مصر
کشورهای حاشیهخلیج فارس
موضوع
انرژی و اقتصاد
تروریسم
خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
دمکراسی و اصلاح
رقابت قدرتهای بزرگ
روابط عرب و اسرائیل
سیاست آمریکا
عرب و اسلام سیاسی
فرایند صلح
منع اشاعه
نظامی و امنیتی
Close List of All Regions and Issues
Close
Search Policy Analysis
TWI English
TWI Arabic:
اللغة العربية
TWI Persian:
فارسی
Fikra Forum
Close Menu
Close
Search Policy Analysis
جستجو
All Policy Analysis by Michael Eisenstadt
Filter by:
Keyword
Region
- Any -
مصر
کشورهای حاشیهخلیج فارس
ایران
عراق
اسرائیل
اردن
لبنان
خاورمیانه
شمال آفریقا
فلسطینیها
سوریه
ترکیه
Issue
- Any -
عرب و اسلام سیاسی
روابط عرب و اسرائیل
دمکراسی و اصلاح
انرژی و اقتصاد
رقابت قدرتهای بزرگ
خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
نظامی و امنیتی
فرایند صلح
منع اشاعه
تروریسم
سیاست آمریکا
تاریخ انتشار
- Any -
Past 7 Days
Past 30 Days
Past Year
Custom range...
Start date
End date
Type
- Any -
مقالهها و دیدگاهها
تحلیل کوتاه
گزارشهای تفصیلی
Sort by
Oldest first
Newest first
Found
346
results
Articles & Testimony
The Challenges of U.S. Preventive Military Action
Excerpted from Checking Iran's Nuclear Ambitions, ed. Patrick Clawson and Henry Sokolski (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, 2004), pp. 113–128. For some U.S. policymakers and military planners, Israel's 1981 raid on Iraq's Osiraq nuclear reactor may serve as an object lesson regarding the potential benefits of preventive military action against
۱ ژانویهٔ ۲۰۰۴
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Insurgency in Iraq:
Implications and Challenges
MICHAEL EISENSTADT The War and the Resistance Some have argued that the coalition might not be facing stiff resistance today if it had fought the war differently. To be sure, coalition forces would likely have killed more of the regime's Fedayeen Saddam cannon fodder if they had invaded from Turkey
۱۰ دسامبر ۲۰۰۳
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Jeffrey White
Michael Knights
In-Depth Reports
The Iranian Nuclear Threat and U.S. Policy (Part IV)
To begin, I would like to make three points. First, it has become clear in recent months that Iran has a clandestine nuclear program, parts of which were recently revealed and parts of which may remain hidden. Second, Iran may be just two to four years from getting the bomb
۱۹ سپتامبر ۲۰۰۳
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
Give the Sunnis a Break—and a Stake
Wistful expressions of hope by US officials that the demise of Odai and Qusay, the sons of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, and indeed of Saddam himself, would undercut the Sunni Arab resistance in Iraq betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of the opposition in the so-called Sunni triangle north and west
۶ سپتامبر ۲۰۰۳
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iran's Nuclear Program—Countdown?
DAVID ALBRIGHT The IAEA's February 2003 visit to Iran revealed that Tehran's nuclear program was much more advanced that previously thought, raising questions about Iranian compliance with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). This issue will be a major topic at the upcoming meeting of the IAEA
۱۳ ژوئن ۲۰۰۳
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iranian Nuclear Weapons (Part I):
The Challenges of U.S. Preventive Action
Having just fought a war to rid Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, and alarmed by fresh signs of dramatic progress by Tehran in the nuclear arena, the United States is pressing the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to declare Iran in violation of its commitments under the Treaty on
۲۷ مهٔ ۲۰۰۳
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Fighting the War to Win the Peace in a Post-Saddam Iraq
As the coalition prepares for the decisive phase of the war against Saddam Husayn's regime, it is crucial that combat operations set the conditions for achieving U.S. war aims and -- just as important -- winning the peace afterward. The principal war aims are: 1) eliminating Iraq's weapons of mass
۲ آوریل ۲۰۰۳
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Jeffrey White
In-Depth Reports
U.S. Policy in Post-Saddam Iraq:
Lessons from the British Experience
INTRODUCTION In launching Operation Iraqi Freedom, the United States embarks on a major undertaking, one that may well involve the creation of a new Iraqi government and a significant, long-term commitment of resources and personnel. This endeavor bears similarities to the British experience in Iraq during the first half of
۱ آوریل ۲۰۰۳
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iraqi Strategy and the Battle for Baghdad
Over the past two days, U.S. forces have battled elements of the four Republican Guard (RG) divisions that form the outer ring of Baghdad's defenses, initiating what may be the decisive phase of the coalition's invasion of Iraq. The possibility of urban combat in Baghdad is a daunting one, entailing
۲۶ مارس ۲۰۰۳
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
U.S. Policy in Post-Saddam Iraq:
Lessons from the British Experience
On March 13, 2003, Washington Institute senior fellow Michael Eisenstadt, U.S. Air Force military fellow Eric Mathewson, and National Strategic Studies senior research professor Judith Yaphe introduced the Institute's forthcoming publication U.S. Policy in Post-Saddam Iraq: Lessons from the British Experience. The following is a rapporteur's summary of their remarks
۱۹ مارس ۲۰۰۳
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iran's Nuclear Program:
Gathering Dust or Gaining Steam?
As the United States looks to disarm Iraq and to defuse or defer a nuclear crisis with North Korea, another nuclear crisis -- with Iran -- looms on the horizon. U.S. policymakers could face critical decisions this year regarding Iran's nuclear program as the Bushehr reactor approaches completion, as Iran's
۳ فوریهٔ ۲۰۰۳
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iraq Crisis after the Blix Report:
Diplomatic and Military Options
On January 27, Hans Blix, director of the UN Monitoring, Verification, and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC), delivered a straightforward report to the Security Council regarding Iraqi compliance with arms resolutions. Twelve years after taking up the obligation to disarm under UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 687, Baghdad still does not genuinely
۳۱ ژانویهٔ ۲۰۰۳
◆
Patrick Clawson
Philip Gordon
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Envisioning a Post-Saddam Iraqi Military
Retraining and reorganizing the Iraqi military and eliminating weapons of mass destruction (WMD) will be vital tasks in the wake of any U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Yet, political change is a prerequisite for military change, and neglecting the former could pose disastrous consequences for the latter. Specifically, the United States
۲۵ نوامبر ۲۰۰۲
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Kenneth Pollack
Brief Analysis
How to Unseat Saddam (Part II)
This two-part essay, prepared for the Foreign Policy Research Institute ( www.fpri.org), is a condensed version of an article that appears in the Winter 2001–2002 issue of the National Interest. Read Part I. II. Psyops and Propaganda Activities Psyops and propaganda activities that aim to diminish Saddam in the eyes
۱۹ دسامبر ۲۰۰۱
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
How to Unseat Saddam (Part I)
This two-part essay, prepared for the Foreign Policy Research Institute ( www.fpri.org), is a condensed version of an article that appears in the Winter 2001–2002 issue of the National Interest. Read Part II. "With respect to what is sometimes characterized as taking out Saddam, I never saw a plan that
۱۸ دسامبر ۲۰۰۱
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
Curtains for the Ba'ath
Even before September 11, 2001, the Bush Administration faced difficult challenges and choices as it charted U.S. policy toward Iraq. The period of Iraqi quiescence following Operation Desert Fox in December 1998 was clearly over, the containment regime on Iraq had weakened, and the resurgence of Israeli-Palestinian violence had imposed
۱۴ دسامبر ۲۰۰۱
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Inside Afghanistan and Pakistan
The Taliban's main concerns are domestic. They have accepted Osama bin Ladin because he is important to their ability to stay in power. They have used bin Ladin's brigade because it was the most capable brigade in countering Ahmed Shah Massoud, the former leader of the Northern Alliance. The Northern
۴ اکتبر ۲۰۰۱
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
'Preemptive Targeted Killings' As a Counterterror Tool:
An Assessment of Israel's Approach
Yesterday's killing of Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) chief Abu Ali Mustafa by Israel, and the State Department's condemnation of this act, have refocused attention on Israel's use of "targeted killings" as part of its counterterror policy. Since the start of the "al-Aqsa intifada," Israeli forces have
۲۸ اوت ۲۰۰۱
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Preparing for a Nuclear Breakout in the Middle East (Part II)
A nuclear breakout by Iraq or Iran could have a number of direct and indirect effects on the region: First, a nuclear breakout by either will cause the United States to be much more careful in its dealings with that state, particularly when it comes to considering military action. America's
۹ اوت ۲۰۰۱
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Preparing for a Nuclear Breakout in the Middle East (Part I)
As U.S. policymakers review options for national missile defense and ways to reshape the military to meet future threats, nuclear proliferation -- particularly in the Middle East -- looms large as one of the most critical future challenges facing the United States. In the coming years, it is conceivable, if
۸ اوت ۲۰۰۱
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Pagination
Previous page
‹‹
First page
« First
…
Page
10
Page
11
Page
12
Page
13
Current page
14
Page
15
Page
16
Page
17
Page
18
Last page
Last »
Next page
››