Skip to main content
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Menu
Toggle Main Menu
Homepage
Main navigation
Analysis
Experts
About
Support
Maps & Multimedia
Trending:
Military & Security
Terrorism
Israel
Palestinians
Lebanon
Iran
Toggle List of
All Regions & Issues
Regions & Countries
Egypt
Gulf States
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Jordan
Lebanon
Middle East
North Africa
Palestinians
Syria
Turkey
Issues
Arab & Islamic Politics
Arab-Israeli Relations
Democracy & Reform
Energy & Economics
Great Power Competition
Gulf & Energy Policy
Military & Security
Peace Process
Proliferation
Terrorism
U.S. Policy
Close List of All Regions and Issues
Close
Search Policy Analysis
TWI English
TWI Arabic:
اللغة العربية
TWI Persian:
فارسی
Fikra Forum
Close Menu
Close
Search Policy Analysis
Search
Breadcrumb
Policy Analysis
All Policy Analysis by Peter David
Filter by:
Keyword
Region
- Any -
Egypt
Gulf States
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Jordan
Lebanon
Middle East
North Africa
Palestinians
Syria
Turkey
Issue
- Any -
Arab & Islamic Politics
Arab-Israeli Relations
Democracy & Reform
Energy & Economics
Great Power Competition
Gulf & Energy Policy
Military & Security
Peace Process
Proliferation
Terrorism
U.S. Policy
Date Published
- Any -
Past 7 Days
Past 30 Days
Past Year
Custom range...
Start date
End date
Type
- Any -
Articles & Testimony
Brief Analysis
In-Depth Reports
Sort by
Oldest first
Newest first
Found
1
results
Video
In-Depth Reports
Syria, U.S. Leadership, and the Direction of Change in the Middle East
Does the United States have a moral obligation to intervene militarily in Syria and, if so, when? That was question when three experts—Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Fouad Ajami, T, Washington bureau chief Peter David, and former U.S. envoy to Syria Ambassador Theodore Kattouf—addressed the Washington Institute for Near East Policy’s
May 5, 2012
◆
Fouad Ajami
Peter David
Robert Satloff