Skip to main content
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Menu
Toggle Main Menu
Homepage
Main navigation
Analysis
Experts
About
Support
Maps & Multimedia
Trending:
Democracy & Reform
Terrorism
Lebanon
Iran
Israel
Syria
Toggle List of
All Regions & Issues
Regions & Countries
Egypt
Gulf States
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Jordan
Lebanon
Middle East
North Africa
Palestinians
Syria
Turkey
Issues
Arab & Islamic Politics
Arab-Israeli Relations
Democracy & Reform
Energy & Economics
Great Power Competition
Gulf & Energy Policy
Military & Security
Peace Process
Proliferation
Terrorism
U.S. Policy
Close List of All Regions and Issues
Close
Search Policy Analysis
TWI English
TWI Arabic:
اللغة العربية
Fikra Forum
Close Menu
Close
Search Policy Analysis
Search
Breadcrumb
Policy Analysis
All Policy Analysis by Michael Eisenstadt
Filter by:
Keyword
Region
- Any -
Egypt
Gulf States
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Jordan
Lebanon
Middle East
North Africa
Palestinians
Syria
Turkey
Issue
- Any -
Arab & Islamic Politics
Arab-Israeli Relations
Democracy & Reform
Energy & Economics
Great Power Competition
Gulf & Energy Policy
Military & Security
Peace Process
Proliferation
Terrorism
U.S. Policy
Date Published
- Any -
Past 7 Days
Past 30 Days
Past Year
Custom range...
Start date
End date
Type
- Any -
Articles & Testimony
Brief Analysis
In-Depth Reports
Sort by
Oldest first
Newest first
Found
351
results
Brief Analysis
U.S. Interests in Syria-Israel and Lebanon-Israel Peace Agreements
Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak has identified peace with Syria and Lebanon as a vital strategic objective and, shortly before leaving for Washington, met with Golan residents to remind them that he believes he was elected to achieve that goal. An understanding between Barak and President Bill Clinton about how
Jul 14, 1999
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Air Strikes and American Strategy toward Iraq
Iraqi president Saddam Husayn is undoubtedly watching events in the Balkans quite closely. Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic's continued defiance of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) proves that the Western alliance continues to misunderstand dictators. Milosevic, like Saddam, does not care about his people but only about his own power
May 7, 1999
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
How to Use the Bombing to Advance Long-Term U.S. Goals for Iraq
The current bombing campaign against Iraq is clearly not going to solve all U.S. problems with Iraq. The issue of the day is then: how can the bombing be used to advance long-term U.S. goals? Ratchet up the Pressure. The United States seems intent on convincing Saddam Husayn that the
Dec 17, 1998
◆
Patrick Clawson
Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
U.S. Military Capabilities in the Post-Cold War Era:
Implications for Middle East Allies
The relationships between the United States and its allies in the Middle East are, for the most part, founded on national security considerations. As a result, trends that might affect the readiness and capabilities of the U.S. armed forces or Washington's ability to use force effectively have potentially far-reaching implications
Dec 4, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Crisis with Iraq:
What Now? What's Next?
Three factors were cited by U.S. officials as reasons not to strike Iraq, none of which is convincing. First was the fear that air strikes would signal the death knell of UNSCOM. In fact, experience shows that Saddam has repeatedly backed down when threatened, and does not take risks when
Nov 25, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Patrick Clawson
Brief Analysis
Turkish-Syrian Relations:
A Crisis Delayed?
Despite unconfirmed reports of Syrian willingness to expel PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan and close PKK bases, Turkish-Syrian tensions are likely to persist; Syria's track record of reneging on pledges to cease supporting the PKK will make Ankara skeptical about the durability of any agreement. For this reason, Turkish military action
Oct 17, 1998
◆
Alan Makovsky
Michael Eisenstadt
In-Depth Reports
Iran Under Khatami:
A Political, Economic, and Military Assessment
Introduction Muhammad Khatami's surprise victory in the May 23, 1997, Iranian presidential election generated much enthusiasm at home and much interest abroad. For Iranians, the massive popular mandate -- Khatami received 70 percent of the vote with a nearly 90 percent turnout -- showed their disillusionment with the ruling establishment
Oct 1, 1998
◆
Patrick Clawson
Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
U.S. Policy Options toward Iraq
Testimony before the House National Security Committee U.S. policy toward Iraq is at a turning point. Decisions made in the coming weeks and months will affect American interests in the Middle East and the fate of the region for years to come. Unfortunately, there is no clear, obvious solutions to
Sep 16, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
The So-Called 'Diplomatic Option'
Richard Murphy's Aug. 25 op-ed piece in support of the administration's "new diplomatic approach" toward Iraq is a recipe for disaster. Ambassador Murphy asserts that this "new approach . . . may prove more effective" than the policy abandoned by the administration after the last confrontation with Iraq that ended
Sep 8, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
What Do the Sudan/Afghanistan Strikes Harbinger?
The U.S. cruise missile attacks on the Sudanese chemical weapons precursor plant and the Afghanistan terrorist camps raises questions about the future direction of U.S. policy on several fronts: the emphasis on state linkages to terrorism, the means used to counter proliferation, the role of law enforcement and military force
Aug 21, 1998
◆
Patrick Clawson
Michael Eisenstadt
Alan Makovsky
David Schenker
Brief Analysis
Iran's Recent Missile Test:
Assessment and Implications
Iran gave a new twist to President Khatami's call for a "civilizational dialogue" on July 22 when it test-launched a medium-range missile with the potential to reach India in the east, Russia in the north, Egypt and Turkey in the west and Israel, Jordan and all Gulf Cooperation Council states
Aug 5, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
'Knives, Tanks, and Missiles':
Israel's Security Revolution
On June 15, 1998, Eliot Cohen, director of the strategic studies program at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Michael Eisenstadt, senior fellow in military affairs at The Washington Institute, and Andrew Bacevich, director of SAIS's Foreign Policy Institute and director-designate of the Center for International Studies
Jun 17, 1998
◆
Eliot Cohen
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iran:
One Year after Khatemi's Election
Iran has become pragmatic. The pragmatism began not with Khatemi but with the first day of the revolution. As happens with any ideological revolution, there is a significant change between the ideology while in opposition and the policy upon taking power. This bitter reality has forced Iran to deviate from
Jun 8, 1998
◆
Patrick Clawson
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Dual Bomb Blasts in South Asia:
Implications for the Middle East
The recent series of nuclear weapons tests in South Asia -- reportedly five bombs by India last week and five by Pakistan yesterday -- are likely to have reverberations for nuclear proliferation in the Middle East, though the impact of these tests may not be evident for some time. A
May 29, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
Iran under Khatami:
Weapons of Mass Destruction, Terrorism, and the Arab-Israeli Conflict
Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Subcommittee on Near East and South Asian Affairs The May 1997 election of Mohammad Khatami as president of Iran has raised hopes and expectations of change in Iran's domestic and foreign policy. In the foreign policy arena, it is possible to discern a
May 18, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iran's Revolutionary Guard Commander Sends a Warning
Remarks last week by Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander Yahya Rahim Safavi during a closed meeting with IRGC officers -- leaked to the Iranian press -- underscore the growing impatience of the country's conservative hardliners with the liberal trend of the Khatami government, Iran's declared intention to adhere to
May 7, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Enhancing Public Preparedness for Chemical and Biological Terrorism
The crisis with Iraq, the decision to immunize U.S. troops against anthrax, and recent incidents in the U.S. and Britain (including at least one hoax) have together raised the American public's awareness of the threat posed by chemical and biological (CB) terrorism. Heightened awareness, however, has not been matched by
Apr 3, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
Missiles and Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) in Iraq and Iran:
Current Developments and Potential for Future Surprises
The following analysis was prepared for the Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States (The Rumsfeld Commission), March 23, 1998. This paper will attempt to answer the following questions: 1) What are the current missile capabilities of Iraq and Iran? 2) What kind of WMD payloads
Mar 28, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iran and Weapons of Mass Destruction
Despite the recent focus on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD), Iran poses a greater long-term threat to U.S. interests in the Persian Gulf. Iran possesses a large chemical weapons (CW) arsenal consisting primarily of first generation (World War I era) agents, and it is believed to have a nerve
Mar 4, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD):
Unresolved Issues
The agreement hammered out by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and Iraqi President Saddam Hussein resolving (at least temporarily) the most recent crisis over access to suspected WMD-related sites in Iraq fails to address the fundamental problem the international community faces in Iraq: Baghdad's continued refusal to comply with UN
Feb 27, 1998
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Pagination
Previous page
‹‹
First page
« First
…
Page
10
Page
11
Page
12
Page
13
Page
14
Page
15
Current page
16
Page
17
Page
18
Last page
Last »
Next page
››